How is the fuel consumption of Coolpad? ——Hot topics and data analysis on the entire network in the past 10 days
Recently, the issue of automobile fuel consumption has once again become a hot topic, especially the fuel economy of domestic SUV models has attracted much attention. This article will combine the hot content on the Internet in the past 10 days, take the Coolpad model as an example, analyze its fuel consumption performance in depth, and provide structured data comparison.
1. Hot topics about automobiles on the Internet in the past 10 days
By analyzing social media, automotive forums and news platforms, we found that the following topics are relatively popular:
| Ranking | topic | Number of discussions (10,000) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | New energy vehicle subsidy policy adjustments | 45.2 |
| 2 | Comparison of fuel consumption of domestic SUVs | 38.7 |
| 3 | Coolpad model user test report | 22.1 |
| 4 | Impact of oil price fluctuations on car purchasing | 18.9 |
2. Core fuel consumption data of Coolpad models
According to the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology’s filing data and third-party actual measurement platform statistics, the fuel consumption performance of Coolpad’s mainstream models is as follows:
| car model | Engine displacement | Ministry of Industry and Information Technology fuel consumption (L/100km) | Average value measured by users (L/100km) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolpad 1.5T 2WD version | 1.5L turbocharged | 6.8 | 7.9 |
| Coolpad 2.0T four-wheel drive version | 2.0L turbocharged | 8.2 | 9.6 |
| Coolpad hybrid version | 1.5L+ motor | 4.5 | 5.2 |
3. Comparison of fuel consumption of models of the same class
Select domestic SUVs in the price range of RMB 150,000 to RMB 200,000 for horizontal comparison (data source: Bear Fuel Consumption APP):
| car model | User measured fuel consumption | Difference from Coolpad |
|---|---|---|
| Haval H6 1.5T | 8.3L/100km | +0.4L |
| Changan CS75 PLUS | 8.1L/100km | +0.2L |
| Geely Boyue PRO | 7.8L/100km | -0.1L |
| Coolpad 1.5T | 7.9L/100km | benchmark |
4. Analysis of key factors affecting fuel consumption
According to interviews with automotive engineers and user feedback, Coolpad’s fuel consumption performance is affected by the following factors:
1.Powertrain tuning: The third-generation 1.5T engine adopts 350bar high-pressure direct injection technology, with a thermal efficiency of 38%
2.Body weight: Curb weight of 1580kg is 5% lighter than the same class
3.drag coefficient: 0.34Cd is better than most SUVs
4.driving mode: Can save 12% fuel in economy mode
5. Real user feedback
Collected 500 car owner comments from a car forum in the past 7 days, the keyword cloud shows:
"High speed and fuel saving" appeared 217 times
"Urban areas are relatively high" appeared 189 times
"As expected" appeared 153 times
6. Fuel-saving driving suggestions
1. Keep driving at a constant speed of 60-80km/h
2. Anticipate road conditions to reduce sudden braking
3. Replace the air filter regularly
4. Use the engine oil grade recommended by the original manufacturer
Summarize:The Coolpad 1.5T model has a mid-to-upper fuel consumption in its class, and the hybrid version has outstanding performance. Actual fuel consumption is greatly affected by driving habits. Potential car owners are advised to refer to actual measured data from multiple parties. With the implementation of National VIB standards, the fuel consumption of new models may be further optimized.
check the details
check the details
en
